{"id":49101,"date":"2021-07-21T20:37:07","date_gmt":"2021-07-22T00:37:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/motor-junkie.com\/?p=49101"},"modified":"2024-01-02T11:47:09","modified_gmt":"2024-01-02T16:47:09","slug":"40-cars-that-went-down-as-the-worst-vehicles-in-auto-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.motor-junkie.com\/40-cars-that-went-down-as-the-worst-vehicles-in-auto-history\/49101\/","title":{"rendered":"40 Cars That Went Down As The Worst Vehicles In Auto History"},"content":{"rendered":"
The automotive industry has obviously evolved by leaps and bounds over the last century and continues to do so each day. Over that time, there’ve been many industry successes. There have also been many failures, otherwise known as “lemons.” These lemons are poorly designed and have become massive commercial flops with consumers throughout automotive history.<\/p>\n
You might remember cars like the Yugo or the Ford Pinto, both of which were horrible to own and drive. Nevertheless, there were other useless cars too such as the Chrysler Sebring, so we took a look at these horrible cars and more in this list.<\/a><\/p>\n Cars don’t get any more horrible than the Chevette. From its design to its engineering<\/a>, this compact Chevy was a dud. Automotive manufacturers needed gas-efficient cars to attract consumers who were feeling the pain at the pump. GM needed to compete with Japanese imports so the Chevette hit the market with that intention. Unfortunately, the car was horrible, almost being illegally slow<\/a> on the highway.<\/p>\n Reliability was also questionable, with a series of early recalls, Some drivers<\/a> reported interior malfunctions within a week of ownership. The Chevette didn’t have a productive run<\/a> which is why you’ll seldom see one on the roadways anymore. GM just didn’t have any luck in the small car market and the Chevette is evidence of that.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n There was a time when the American<\/a> Motor Company (AMC) was one of the most dominant forces in the automotive industry. However, by the time the Pacer came around, this was far from the truth and consumers were wary. The Pacer is often credited with having one of the worst designs in automotive history.<\/p>\n In addition to its questionable design, the Pacer also lacked in the performance<\/a> department, being painfully slow for the time. A common upgrade nowadays is to swap out the original AMC engine with a GM LS powerplant, although you’ll spend far more than the car is worth<\/a>. The Pacer is iconic for being a flop<\/a> more than anything else, and that’s not very flattering.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Performance cars<\/a> of the 1980s were painfully affected by the decade’s emissions regulations. The GM family of V8 performance cars<\/a> was especially affected by this, and the Corvette was the first victim. The 305 “California” edition had all of the new emissions equipment bolted onto the engine and they made the car painfully slow. Gone was the spirited performance of the past, instead, the Corvette<\/a> was now a slug.<\/p>\n Its 180 HP was shameful at best and one of the lowest points in the history of the Corvette. There’s nothing nice about the sports cars<\/a> from the 1980s that had to suffer through these emissions regulations. Finding a Corvette “California” edition isn’t what you’d call a remarkable find.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Mondial has gone down as one of the worst Ferrari models of all time, and that’s not a friendly distinction. Like most early adopters of new technology, the Mondial featured<\/a> a boatload of electronics in its design, all of which would fail. Most Ferrari owners found that the Mondial spent more time in the repair shop than on the road<\/a>.<\/p>\n That’s not a very good look for what is supposed to be a high-end luxury sports car<\/a>. Ferrari is known for building some of the best sports cars<\/a> in the world, but the Mondial 8 will surely go down as one of the worst. Surprisingly, the Mondial has developed a sort of cult-like following and values<\/a> have begun to rise.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Cylinder deactivation is a commonplace occurrence in today’s automotive industry<\/a>, but there was a time when it was a new idea. The Fleetwood V-8-6-4 was the first car<\/a> to feature cylinder deactivation technology, and it turned out to be a horrible thing. From the start, the Fleetwood V-8-6-4 was unreliable and would often leave the driver<\/a> stranded. Considering the high price tag and Cadillac’s reputation, this isn’t something that a flagship model should be doing.<\/p>\n The Fleetwood was and still is highly considered to be the pinnacle of the Cadillac brand. But the V-8-6-4 is largely considered one of the worst Cadillac models ever made<\/a>. The technology was brand new and GM didn’t do enough to iron out the kinks, and the result was a sad, poorly-designed ride.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n After the success of the ‘Back To The Future’ franchise, the DMC-12 became a smash hit and a piece of pop culture. But few people realized that the DMC-12 was an actual production vehicle drivers could purchase. 8,582 original DMC-12 models were produced during the short lifespan of the vehicle. The story behind the De Lorean is probably a lot more intriguing than the car itself, as its driving characteristics weren’t that good.<\/p>\n There were a lot of shortcuts taken in the production of the DMC-12, and the result was incredibly shoddy build quality. All in all, these cars have become highly sought after in the current muscle car bubble with prices skyrocketing past their original value. Apparently, who wouldn’t want to drive the same car that Marty McFly was riding shotgun in?<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Cadillac just had a bad time in the 1980s and the Cimarron was a prime example of this. Often dubbed the worst Cadillac ever, the Cimarron was a Chevy<\/a> Cavalier with a Cadillac logo on it. We’re not sure what GM was thinking here yet the company did it for almost a decade. This model garnered some of the most unfavorable reviews from the automotive press ever.<\/p>\n The Cimarron isn’t a bad car, but the fact that it was marketed as something completely different than what it was isn’t right. GM could have sold a Cavalier decked out with all the optional equipment instead of doing this to consumers. Nowadays, the Cimarron is a perfect example of what you don’t want to do in the automotive industry.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Camaro has gone through a lot of different incarnations over its decades-long existence. The worst incarnation was the Iron Duke. In the 1980s, GM needed gas-efficient cars<\/a> so the idea was to make the Camaro gas-efficient. Unfortunately putting a weakened four-cylinder in a full-size sports car<\/a> was never going to work. This Camaro was lethargic in addition to being notoriously unreliable.<\/p>\n The Iron Duke is perhaps the most negatively impacted Camaro of the 1980s, with a string of design flaws that were unimaginable. Muscle cars<\/a> have always been the focal point of the Chevy lineup, and the Iron Duke was a blemish on an otherwise stellar reputation. Four cylinders just didn’t add up when it came to a Camaro back then, so the Iron Duke was a big flop.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Maserati is a brand car<\/a> fans equate with luxury and refinement, but that wasn’t the case with this car. It more resembles an Isuzu Impulse than anything else, and that’s not a compliment. The Maserati Biturbo was notoriously unreliable, with everything from oil burning to a mixture of overheating issues. Luxury cars<\/a> from this era were just evolving and the Biturbo was a fixture of this phase.<\/p>\n If the Maserati version of the car wasn’t bad enough, there was a partnership with Chrysler that birthed the 1990s Maserati TC. Both cars were phenomenally hard to repair and the reliability was among the worst that has been seen from Maserati. Coupled with its high price tag, the Biturbo was a variable basket of problems for whoever owned one.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n One of the ugliest and most forgotten American sports cars<\/a>, the Mosler Consulier GTP was a one-off exotic with a bad reputation. The Consulier GTP had a Chrysler powerplant and a lot of the parts were shared with existing Chryslers. Aside from that, the design of the car<\/a> looked like a prehistoric McLaren F1. The 2.2-liter turbocharged four-cylinder was shared with the mundane Dodge Daytona.<\/p>\n And all of those parts were sourced from Mitsubishi, which meant that nothing on this car was original equipment. The exterior styling of the Consulier GTP was polarizing which is why the car didn’t resonate with consumers. To this day the Consulier is a rarity and you’ll seldom find one on the road because of lackluster sales.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Few cars have been as lambasted as the Yugo, and for good reasons. The car was just downright horrible. The Yugo had substandard build quality, far beyond the normal scope of an economy car. The buck didn’t stop at its lackluster build quality either, as the car was notoriously unreliable. Although the Yugo was the cheapest car in America, it failed to garner consumer confidence.<\/p>\n Believe it or not, the Yugo has become sort of a cultural phenomenon because of its notorious rep. Even the Hyundai Excel didn’t get as bad of a reputation as the Yugo managed to get in a short period. The Yugo will undeniably go down as history as the most lambasted “lemon” in the automotive world.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n You may think the Lamborghini URUS is the first SUV to bare a Lambo badge, but that isn’t correct. The LM002 was a unique proposition for the brand, which had only sold high-end luxury cars<\/a> up to that point. At first glance, the LM002 looks like an amphibious Hummer of sorts, but deep down it was just an off-road Countach. The performance of the LM002 was admirable for an SUV of this size and stature, but its reliability and design were iffy.<\/p>\n The sheer limited availability of the LM002 made repairs difficult, not to mention its high cost of ownership. Nowadays the LM002 has become sort of a relic, you’ll seldom find one for sale. Lamborghini is a company that has experienced a few flops and the LM002 is the most notable one.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Believe it or not, General Motors was ahead of the curve when it came to electric cars<\/a>, and then their program just vanished. The EV1 was one of the first mass-produced electric cars<\/a> that gained a mainstream following. Unfortunately, GM deemed the program to be a threat to the sales of their full-size SUV models<\/a> and canceled the program altogether. They trashed practically every EV1 ever manufactured instead of selling the cars<\/a> at the end of leases.<\/p>\n The EV1 is probably one of the most evident stories of greed in the automotive industry. Consumers were hungry for a functional electric car<\/a>, and the EV1 was as close to perfect as you could have gotten back then. Sadly, the GM EV1 never managed to see the new millennium and even spawned the hit documentary film.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The 1990s were a time of innovation at Chrysler like never before and the company was striking hit after hit with consumers. The Plymouth brand was sort of a sore spot because it didn’t have a brand identity like Dodge and Chrysler did, which meant a halo car was needed. Inspired by a Chip Foose design, the Prowler looked like every bit the retro hot rod<\/a>. The only problem was that Chrysler forgot to give it power and stuck a standard-issue 3.5L V6 under the hood.<\/p>\n Needless to say, consumers weren’t impressed and the Prowler became more of a showroom piece than anything. Sales were low and Plymouth was eventually discontinued in 2001, at which point the Prowler became a Chrysler for a few more stagnant years. Had Chrysler incorporated a V8 powerplant, the Prowler could have been a smash hit.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ford<\/a> never had a direct competitor for the Chevrolet Suburban and consumers were hungry for something that was a tad bit larger than an Expedition. The interesting thing about the Excursion was that it featured the same Triton V10 as the Super Duty pickup truck<\/a>. The design of the Excursion was fairly basic and the price tag was extremely high, which drove a lot of consumers away.<\/p>\n Gas mileage was also horrible and the Excursion was released right on the heels of the 2008 economic recession. Interestingly enough, the Excursion has become highly sought after on the used car market, with consumers flocking toward the diesel version of the truck. A used Excursion can potentially set you back quite a bit of money for a clean example.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Jaguar X-Type is a fun-to-drive and well-designed car<\/a> if you can find one that still runs. The X-Type was a notorious failure for Ford, as the company owned the Jaguar brand. The problem with the X-Type was that it wasn’t a Jaguar at all, instead, the platform was used in many other Ford vehicles. Reliability on the X-Type was downright awful, and consumers would spend more time in the shop than on the road.<\/p>\n Repair costs for the X-Type were also very high, which didn’t sit well with a lot of consumers. You couldn’t buy a brand new X-Type without coming back to the dealership time and time again. There was a limited-edition V8 model of the X-Type but this too had a lot of reliability issues. The value of the car on the used market is barely anything and parts are expensive.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n GM has been at the forefront of a lot of segments in the auto industry<\/a>. The company was attempting to embrace future crossovers with the Pontiac Aztek, but what happened was the car was shunned. From a design standpoint, the Aztek is known as one of the ugliest cars ever made<\/a>.<\/p>\n From the awkward shape to the abundance of body cladding, the Aztek is ugly and underpowered to boot. The Aztek was a monumental failure for GM and cost the company millions of dollars. Seemingly odd enough, though, the Aztek found a second life as a collector’s item after the hit show “Breaking Bad” went viral.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n There was a huge amount of suspense before the release of the new 7-Series model because it was going to be the first modern incarnation<\/a> of the car. With abundant technology, the 2002 7-Series seemed to do everything right until you owned one. From the gate, this generation of the 7-Series was plagued by electrical and reliability problems.<\/p>\n Consumers were quite upset to say the least as the repairs could cost thousands of dollars. The 7-Series from this era cost BMW a lot of money, the car was notoriously unreliable and there was a bit of a consumer backlash. BMWs are known for expensive repairs but this was far worse compared to any BMW model before it.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Bigger was better in the 2000s and everyone wanted a blinged-out SUV<\/a>. What’s more blinged-out than a giant Hummer H2? Well, nothing, and that’s why the initial sales of the SUV were very strong. But GM also faced a large amount of backlash for the carbon footprint that the company was making with the H2.<\/p>\n Then 2008 rolled around and Hummer lost millions of dollars, these SUVs were just sitting on the lots. GM eventually went bankrupt and closed the Hummer brand altogether until 2020 where the brand was renounced. Surprisingly enough, the H2 has held its value reasonably well on the used car market.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Another interesting Chevy model was the SSR, which was sort of a modern<\/a> take on the El Camino. The engine was an LS V8 that provided ample performance, but the design of the car was impractical. More of a showroom queen than an actual roadster, the SSR didn’t have very much room in its interior.<\/p>\n The price tag was also very high and the truck bed was utterly useless, which would have been its only selling point. The rounded-off front fascia was also a bit difficult to look at, which made the car<\/a> very awkward. The SSR wasn’t the hit that GM had hoped for and it was shelved after a few years.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n After the Chevy Metro was canned in 2001, the brand needed a small car and the Aveo was the next best option. It was a Daewoo model sold around the world and GM decided to import it to America. The build quality was lackluster at best and the car got largely unfavorable reviews from the automotive press.<\/p>\n When stacked up to compete against the likes of Hyundai and Kia, the Aveo just didn’t add up. Consumes could get a better value from the other two brands with more standard features and safety options for the price. The Aveotrudge d on for almost a decade until it was finally discontinued in favor of the Chevy Sonic.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Jeep brand is one of the hottest automotive nameplates in the world<\/a> right now but the 2000s were a rough patch. The brand wasn’t selling as it should and the models were becoming outdated, so Jeep did the unthinkable. The brand took the Dodge Caliber compact and slapped a Jeep badge on it, calling it the Compass.<\/p>\n The ugly little car didn’t have any off-road chops whatsoever and was the furthest thing from a Jeep. Consumers weren’t stupid and the evidence that this was a Caliber was fairly obvious. The car didn’t sell<\/a> well at all, eventually being redesigned into an actual crossover. The first general of the Compass is a clear laughingstock of the auto industry.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The replacement for the Dodge Neon was positioned as a value-oriented compact, but the reality was far different. The Caliber was notoriously cheaply made with a rattling interior and the looks that only a mother could love. The car didn’t resonate with consumers at all and the outgoing Neon was a better car in many aspects.<\/p>\n The Caliber was sold for quite a while until the Dodge Dart came onto the scene, Its design was easily forgettable. Nowadays you’ll still see the Caliber around but prices are almost minuscule. Even for basic transportation, the Caliber is a car you might want to avoid.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Chrysler Sebring Convertible was a strong seller for Chrysler for several years. The Sebring sedan, on the other hand, was not. A car often relegated to rental car lots, the Sebring was about as barebones as you could get. The design was cheaply made with lots of hard plastics and an underpowered engine.<\/p>\n Wrap this in a semi-upscale design and you have what amounts to one of the worst-designed cars on the road. The 2.7L V6 is largely considered the worst engine Chrysler has ever made<\/a> with reliability issues and lawsuits pending to this day. This incarnation of the Sebring sedan was as bad as you could get and it’s no wonder it didn’t sell.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The next generation of the Sebring convertible was just as bad, featuring the same cheap interior as the sedan. Reliability was almost nonexistent with these cars, often suffering from transmission failures and worse.<\/p>\n The brand itself suffered tremendously from the redesign as the Sebring convertibles that came before were much more refined. The Sebring Convertible redesign is highly regarded as one of the downfalls of Chrysler in the 2000s. The convertible went from being a sort of upscale luxury model to a forgotten relic you’d find on an Avis lot.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Who releases a full-sized outdated SUV model at the height of an economic recession? Chrysler does. The Aspen had to be the worst-planned SUV model of all time, coming out amid a recession. If that wasn’t bad enough, the Aspen was a carbon clone of the outdated and poorly constructed Dodge Durango SUV.<\/p>\n Nothing about the Aspen made it remotely feasible for an SUV driver who wanted something modern. The high price tag and lack of features made Aspen one of the poorest-selling models in Chrysler history.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lexus is usually a company that hits home runs with their vehicle designs and sales, but that wasn’t the case with the 250h. A hybrid Lexus was a good idea, but when it looks like a Toyota<\/a> Corolla that probably won’t fly. The 250h was a poorly designed model that took a lot of its design roots from the humble Toyota model.<\/p>\n The size of the 250h made it smaller in size than the Lexus IS while the price was almost the same. Most consumers didn’t see the use in buying a car like this and quickly decided to bail on the 250h, after which the car was quietly discontinued.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Dodge Dart had a lot of fanfare and preparation put into the design of the car. Chrysler reportedly spent a billion dollars on the design to have a hit car that would resonate with consumers. The result was sales that were far beyond expectations and the Dart went down as an epic failure.<\/p>\n Chrysler failed to anticipate the consumer shift toward crossover vehicles, and that made the Dart and the 200 bombs from the start. After this, Chrysler directed its attention toward crossover vehicles and the Dart and 200 became a memory.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Released alongside the Dodge Dart, the Chrysler 200 was meant to be a next-generation car. The result, however, was a decent car that consumers just didn’t like for several reasons. The Chrysler 200 was just a car that was released at the wrong time, and the company spent over a billion dollars on its development alongside the Dart.<\/p>\n The 200 failed to pick up where the Sebring left off and consumers weren’t interested in a Chrysler sedan. Had the design been released a couple of years prior, Chrysler might have had something, but no one bought into the hype.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Crosstour is probably one of the worst Honda models of all time. The design of the car was an early entry in the crossover movement, but the final design had a lot of flaws. The car had numerous blind spots, some of which were detrimental to the safety of the vehicle.<\/p>\n On top of that, the price tag was much higher than your standard run-of-the-mill Accord, and a lot of buyers couldn’t justify the added cost. The crossover design of the car didn’t look appealing to most consumers, striking a mix of wannabe wagon and hatchback.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lincoln has had a tough time trying to peddle these sedans to consumers, and the MKS was an example of this. The redesigned MKS had the usual high amount of hype behind it, but the final design was a mere shadow of the Ford Fusion. The interior was cheaply made and the car was lacking in the power department.<\/p>\n The MKS was not a strong seller for Lincoln at all as consumers just went toward other makes and models. The car would trudge on for a few years but never amounted to the success that the company had hoped for.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n When Mitsubishi decided to resurrect the Mirage there was a lot of fanfare behind it. However, the final product was sad to say the least, and about as barebones as you could get. The design was cheaply made and reminiscent of a 1990s hatchback instead of a 2013 model.<\/p>\n The performance of the Mirage was also painfully slow, far below what you’d expect out of a car that was released in this decade. Mitsubishi updated the exterior of the Mirage a few times but for the most part, the car has been a dud for the company<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The CLA-Class had a specific purpose to be an entry-level Mercedes Benz model. The price tag was right but the design and the features weren’t, which is why consumers didn’t gravitate toward it. The dashboard design was about as confusing as you could get and performance was underwhelming.<\/p>\n Pretty much the only reason that any drivers purchased a CLA-Class was to flaunt the Mercedes Benz logo. The actual fit and finish of the vehicle are far below what you’d expect out of a car from Mercedes. For the most part, the CLA-Class was a tremendous failure for the Mercedes brand in general.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Outlander is one SUV model that drivers knew was on the market but never really considered. Its design was far below the other SUV models on the market and its powertrain was outdated. In 2014 the company decided to do a redesign of the model and it fared poorly with the public perception of the company.<\/p>\n40: Chevy Chevette (1976)<\/h2>\n
39: AMC Pacer (1978)<\/h2>\n
38: Corvette 305 “California” (1980)<\/h2>\n
37: Ferrari Mondial 8 (1980)<\/h2>\n
36: Cadillac Fleetwood V-8-6-4 (1981)<\/h2>\n
35: De Lorean DMC-12 (1981)<\/h2>\n
34: Cadillac Cimarron (1982)<\/h2>\n
33: Camaro Iron Duke (1982)<\/h2>\n
32: Maserati Biturbo (1984)<\/h2>\n
31: Mosler Consulier GTP (1985)<\/h2>\n
30: Yugo GV (1985)<\/h2>\n
29: Lamborghini LM002 (1986)<\/h2>\n
28: GM EV1 (1997)<\/h2>\n
27: Plymouth Prowler (1997)<\/h2>\n
26: Ford Excursion (2000)<\/h2>\n
25: Jaguar X-Type (2001)<\/h2>\n
24: Pontiac Aztek (2001)<\/h2>\n
23: BMW 7-Series (2002)<\/h2>\n
22: Hummer H2 (2003)<\/h2>\n
21: Chevy SSR (2004)<\/h2>\n
20: Chevrolet Aveo (2005)<\/h2>\n
19: Jeep Compass (2007)<\/h2>\n
18: Dodge Caliber (2007)<\/h2>\n
17: Chrysler Sebring (2007)<\/h2>\n
16: Chrysler Sebring Convertible (2007)<\/h2>\n
15: Chrysler Aspen (2009)<\/h2>\n
14: Lexus HS 250h (2010)<\/h2>\n
13: Dodge Dart (2012)<\/h2>\n
12: Chrysler 200 (2012)<\/h2>\n
11: Honda Crosstour (2013)<\/h2>\n
10: Lincoln MKS (2013)<\/h2>\n
9: Mitsubishi Mirage (2013)<\/h2>\n
8: Mercedes Benz CLA-Class (2013)<\/h2>\n
7: Mitsubishi Outlander (2014)<\/h2>\n